Monday, March 05, 2007

Cat Challenge

Well, i challenged myself to do 100 stts, 100 hours of omaha hi lo 100 hu games and 50 mtts to compare how i did in all.

The MTT challenge has yet to be completed. After about 10 mtts im operating at -10$/hour so not great, but we'll wait for the full 50 before drawing any tenuous conclusions. (because 50 will be statistically significant of course. What? You don't agree with this kipper? Well guess what son, GFY!)

STTS

I've just finished 100. These were the results.

PLAYED - 100
PROFIT -$1468
HOURS PLAYED - 57
HOURLY RATE - $25.63
ROI - 63.74%
1st places - 26
2nd places - 20
3rd places - 11
(in 9/10 handed)
BUBBLES - 13

PLACED IN $ - 57 OUT OF 100


I played most of these at 15-25$ level and the majority were 9 handed although there were some 6 pacs and some 10'ers in there too. I started like a train and was on over 100% ROI for about the first 40 but variance caught up with me and i had a very bad patch with 30 left dropping my ROI significantly.

I 2 tabled most of these, found the kippers very easy to play and read. Once I get my bankroll to a good level, I hope to start playing more 50s and 100s where I feel I do have an edge.
I feel like I can actually raise my ROI at up to 25$ stt level from the 63% it is at at the moment. Whether this is optimistic or not i don't know. STT specialist would probably tell me it is, but it's good to be positive! Let's see how the next 100 go.

HEADS UP STTS

Well, i haven't played many stts so i'm going by my stats from last year over 325 games, almost exclusively at 20$ level.

GAMES WON/ PLAYED - 255/394
GAMES WON % - 64.7%
PROFIT - $1868.25
HOURLY RATE - $32.9

I could do with some more HU practice but again I would like to challenge myself at the higher levels and once my bankroll is in better shape I should be able to see whether I can maintain the 65% winning rate at this level.

I have to cut the post short for now but I'll put the rest of my stats and what conclusions I can draw from them up shortly. Till then, be safe kippers....

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home